How did we gather our data?
For its Analysis, EWSI examined the programmes/manifestos of national political parties for the 2019 European Parliament elections. The analysis looked only at the official programmes of political parties. This means that statements made to journalists or blog posts, among other types of documents or publications related to the elections, are not part of the analysis.
The EWSI Editorial Team combed through the European Parliament election programmes of all national political parties that won at least 1 MEP seat. Whenever the parties talked about migrant or refugee integration in their programmes, the Editorial Team classified the relevant statements as belonging to one or more of the thematic categories below. By tallying the number of parties that made statements in each thematic category, EWSI can analyse which topics were most popular among the parties.
Furthermore, by calculating how many MEPs each national political party will have in the 2019-2024 European Parliament, the analysis indicates how the new Parliament might act on integration-related matters over the next five years.
EWSI examined the political parties of each EU Member State, and not the political groups of the European Parliament. Where political parties formed coalitions and ran as a single electoral list, the coalition is considered to be one party, following the European Parliament’s reporting of election results. Programmes of independent candidates are not part of this analysis.
EWSI examined the programmes and manifestos (used interchangeably) of the political parties—in other words, the published statements of political parties that outline their key priorities and goals. EWSI focused on the parties’ official programmes, which may have been published as a (pdf) document or as a dedicated section of the party’s website. The analysis does not include politicians’ blog posts, statements recounted by the media or outside analyses or compilations of the parties’ positions and programmes.
Party coalitions typically published joint programmes. In rare cases, coalition partners published separate programmes, in which case this analysis considers the different programmes to come from the same party. The lack of overall detail in some party programmes impacts the results, as the analysis cannot include ideas or proposals that are not formally documented as the party’s programme.
The analysis only looked at programmes published specifically for the 2019 European Parliament elections. Thus, it does not include the parties’ general programmes. In some countries, the European Parliament elections took place simultaneously with other elections. A small number of parties combined the programmes for the different elections into a single document. The analysis tried to include only the programme points that were relevant for the EU elections, but it is not always possible to make a distinction.
This analysis uses the pre-Brexit allocation of MEPs. Thus, there are a total of 751 MEPs, including the 73 MEPs from the United Kingdom. Following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU, a different allocation of MEP seats will take effect, with some EU countries thereafter gaining MEPs. These additional MEPs or political parties are not included here.
Details
- Publication dates
- Source